Tuesday, March 08, 2005

About me

Name: Kenny Pierce

Likely blog topics: bad jokes, baseball, adoption, Kazakhstan, big families, some politics, quite a bit on religion at least at first just because it's on my mind at the moment.


I was born in 1966, in Tyler, Texas, but grew up in Hartshorne, Oklahoma. My father was a remedial English teacher in the public school...remedial, even though he was offered the chance to work with the gifted-and-talented crowd, because he has much more patience for honest and hard-working stupidity than he does for arrogant and self-indulgent intelligence. (And yet, still he manages to love me.) My mom was an aide in the school library, and my sister was only a year behind me in school; so for years our family life revolved around the school schedule. When I was in elementary school my father found himself taking on a second job as a minister in the Disciples of Christ church, and though he has retired from teaching, he continues to serve as a minister.

I was a scrawny kid (5-11-and-3/4 and 130 pounds) who managed to start on the varsity basketball team at 4-A McAlester High School for all three years of my eligibility, pretty much purely on the strength of guile, an infinite capacity for practice, and a sweet twenty-foot jump shot. (It also helped that I wasn't exactly vying for a spot in the lineup of one of the state's basketball powers, as we routinely exited the playoffs in the first round.) The year after I graduated, the three-point line was installed, which would have increased my point totals by at least 25% [sigh]. A fall off a house ten years ago did severe damage to my back and reduced my participation in basketball to telling stories of my glory days, and now my wife threatens to buy me a T-shirt that reads, "The older I get...the better I was."

I went to agnosticism early and got very passionate about logic and about how the "irrational animal," if I may correct an obvious typographical error in Aristotle's text, goes about indulging his passion for self-deception. It wasn't until I married a psychology major from Rice that I began to realize -- thanks to her patient explanations -- that it is more important to understand people than it is to understand arguments. Still working on that one to this day.

Dessie and I have been married since June of 1989. Kasia ("KAH-shuh") came along in 1990; identical twins Sean and Kegan followed in 1992, and then Merry Elisabeth showed up in 1995. In 2002 we met and fell in love with two orphans from Kazakhstan, and in 2003 we brought Sally and Rusty (both born in 1997) home to Austin, Texas. In the process, though, we fell in love with the unadoptable kids who were never going to make it into permanent families; and we now run a very small foundation (http://www.cccpfoundation.org/) helping those Kazakh orphans. As I type, Dessie is actually in Kazakhstan on a foundation trip; and we hope to move to Kazakhstan sometime in 2006. We're in a race against time to adopt two more girls before the elder turns 18, after which we expect to be done expanding our own personal family. After all, even with the extra seat welded in the back of our green Suburban, Jack Daniels (so named because he'S A BOURBON...Dessie insists that our cars must have names and my sense of humor runs to bad puns)...at any rate, even with that extra seat, we're about to run out of seatbelts.

You can expect lots of blogging about the adoption process and the orphans, of course.

I was a classics major at Princeton but realized (too late to change my major) that the last place any person of my non-conformist intellectual tendencies and distaste for petty politics and pettier politicians should try to live and work, was in academia. With the flair for planning that has characterized most of my absent-minded wanderings through life, I graduated from college knowing a decent amount of Hebrew and being more or less fluent in English, Latin, Greek, French and German...and moved promptly to Texas, without being able to speak Spanish. I wound up trading commodities futures for seven years, until I lost my business partner to leukemia. Figuring that seven years of that stress had been fun and remunerative but was also amply sufficient, I switched over to a career as a software consultant for large energy trading companies.

My sense of humor runs heavily to irony and self-deprecation. Human folly is very amusing to me, and I seem to provide myself with an inexhaustible supply. I'm very hard to offend, which of course means that I tend to be unintentionally offensive to others on a regular basis. ("Wait a minute...you mean your feelings got hurt by that? Oops...my bad.")

My wife is much funnier than I am, as you can see for yourself by ordering her genuinely hilarious book It All Started When the Toilet Fell Over, readily available at Amazon. I am a member of that very much non-exclusive club of Men Who Married Better Than Did Their Wives.

Since religion and politics are the two things that most color our views, I figure I should explain mine briefly...especially since, at first, one of the things I'm going to blog about a lot is the ongoing divorce between the conservative and progressive branches of the Episcopal Church of the U.S.A. (ECUSA) and what I think we can learn about getting along with each other even when we deeply disagree about fundamentals in religion.

In religion, I'm essentially of the Truth persuasion rather than the Superstition, Family or Therapy persuasions...and you won't know what that means unless you read my post about it, because I invented that terminology myself. Until recently I'd have described myself as a "conservative Episcopalian," but in light of recent developments, I think it's time to drop the "Episcopalian" and simply refer to myself as "Anglican." I grew up shuttling between the Southern Baptist and Disciples of Christ churches; I entered my early teens as an agnostic (though I kept that fact a secret from my parents because I didn't want to upset them); I returned to Christianity based primarily on the writings and arguments of Anglicans and Roman Catholics; I married a Southern Baptist girl four days after graduating from Princeton cum laude with a classics degree; and Dessie and I both were promptly confirmed as Episcopalians. Now that the Truth branch of ECUSA and the Therapy brances are going their separate ways in a long-overdue cessation of hypocritical pretence of sharing a single religion, it's time to relabel ourselves as Anglicans.

In politics, I think all valid thought about politics must begin with the recognition that everything government does, is done either by force or by the credible threat thereof. This is simply a fact. If you see no problem with the use of force, then we part ways immediately. I, however, think that there is an a priori presumption against the use of force or fraud against other people, meaning that if you're going to use force against people or else trick them, you have to be able to show an ethical reason for overcoming the general rule that beating other people up or lying to them or shooting them or tying them down or taking their money over their heated objections or shoving them into a room and not letting them come out, is evil. Where I part ways with most Americans is in their willingness to accept justifications for governmental use of force that I cannot bring myself to find acceptable.

I do not accept that a majority vote in a democracy overcomes this ethical barrier. If it were true that anything a majority votes for becomes valid, then the Shi'ites in Iraq could vote to kill all Kurds and Sunnis, and, since the Shi'ites represent a majority, this action would be valid. A majority vote provides at best a procedural authorization, not an ethical justification.

Through much reading of political philosophy from all ends of the spectrum, I have come to the conclusion that force and fraud may be used, within limits, against those who themselves do not respect the rights of others to be free from violence and fraud. But attempts to justify other types of violence and threats thereof, aimed at people who are honest and don't go around beating other people up -- which is to say, other types of government activity -- seem sorely inadequate to me. This means that I'm closer to being a Libertarian than anything else...though since I demand the same rigor from those who would allow violence to be practiced against fetuses, and the pro-abortion lobby as far as I can tell has failed miserably to offer any rationalization of the practice that couldn't be used equally well to deny legal protection to other classes of persons such as infants or the severely handicapped, I am a pro-life Libertarian, which may seem to be a contradiction in terms. (And no, I'm not begging the question of whether fetuses are persons, and no, I have no intention of blogging on the question of abortion, where everybody has his/her mind made up anyway, and no, "begging the question" does not mean "making people want very badly to ask the question." This abortion stuff is background information only, and I have no intention of allowing it to come to the foreground.)

In short, I believe passionately in the rights of individuals; and since I know perfectly well what the fallacy of hypostasization is, I deny that "majorities" or "peoples" or "races" or "communities" or any other abstraction or group has rights except insofar as those "rights" can be shown to be valid metaphorical shorthand for the rights of the individuals within that group. If you don't know what the fallacy of hypostasization is, then you should stop talking politics until you've gone and looked it up. Thus, for example, I believe in the right of "self-determination" -- but only for individuals, which is to say, not in the sense in which it is generally used. The right of "the Shi'ites" to have the privilege of "self-determination" in the sense that the majority of them can agree to impose injustice upon the minority, does not exist, for the simple reason that "the Shi'ites" as such do not exist any more than does the "average American" with his 2.5 children; and the right of "self-determination" so construed cannot be extended to each individual without collapsing. (It amounts to giving the majority the "right" to oppress the minority, and therefore cannot be derived from the individual rights of each person, as it constitutes the denial of the rights of many.)

I believe in democracy as a tool, not as an ethical principle. If an absolute dictator were to restrict all of his use of power to punishing and inhibiting those who would lie to or wreak violence upon his subjects, that government would be more legitimate than the government of the Jim Crow American South, in which a democratic majority used the power of the law and police violently to oppress a despised minority. But of course it's much harder for democracies to be perverted than for absolute dictatorships to be perverted; and I am therefore for purely pragmatic reasons a proponent of republican, constitutional democracy.

And I don't tend to like bossy people. Since anybody who runs for public office is basically saying, "Please give me the power to tell everybody else what to do and hurt 'em if they don't," public office is intrinsically attractive to bossy people. "There oughta be a law," means, "I can't convince people to behave the way I want them to of their own free will; so we oughta start makin' 'em do it my way, and if we have to bust a few heads, well, hey, they shoulda had the sense to do it my way to start with." To which my immediate response is, "Mind your own business." So I'm Libertarian not only by conviction, but by temperament as well...I think the term "public servant" is ironic since ordinarily it's the servant who has to do what the master says on pain of punishment, not the other way around.

Having said that...of course I know and like lots of people who work in government, precisely because most of them have never thought about how much their work is based on force, and they really are motivated by good motives, not by a thirst for power. I deeply, deeply admire and appreciate our soldiers and policemen, and part of the passion with which I object to the money we waste on stuff the government has no business doing, comes from the fact that we could be using that money to pay our policemen and soldiers what they deserve. I grant you that I have a prejudice against politicians and bureaucrats in the abstract, but it's pretty easily overcome. I spent a summer working for Carl Albert, for example, and the guy is awesome, even though I disagree with most of his political views; and I deeply appreciate the role he played in shepherding our country through the Watergate mess. So all I'm really saying is, if a person's preferred approach to solving problems involves the government instead of some form of non-coercive persuasion, he's rather more likely to be bossy than not.

Finally, having read Keynes's General Theory several times, and von Mises's Human Action several times, as well as lots of other economics texts back in the day when I was an undergraduate questioning everything my parents had taught me, I think the Austrian school wins, hands down (though I'm open to new evidence, since I got bored with the topic ten years ago and quit keeping up with it). So I think that the Libertarian approach is not only superior ethically, and more congenial to my temperament, but pragmatically more effective as well. Go check out the results of New Zealand's recent overhaul of their educational system, and then go look at GB2's "No Child Left Behind" excrescence, and then ask yourself why anybody would think that the best way to solve an educational crisis would be to find a country that had implemented spectacularly successful educational reform...and then do the exact opposite in practically every respect.

I should add one further point: I don't for a moment believe that life is, can ever be, or even ought to be "fair." But the explanation and defense of that statement would require its own very long post.

And that's enough background, I think.

UPDATE (16 Sep 2005): We did beat the deadline, and we did adopt both Jessica and Jennifer, though the immigration paperwork is still in the pipeline and they are therefore still in Kazakhstan.

I did lots of adoption blogging, and unless you have lots of time and little of value to do, you won't want to read everything on the blog about it because it would take forever. But if you want a quick update on what's happened since I originally posted "About Me," there's a post that serves as a sort of table of contents for all the adoption posts. Thus you can go here for a collection of the links to adoption posts, in the optimal order for reading (which is not the order in which they were posted), and with a quick summing-up of each post so that you can get the whole story in express form.


At 3:48 PM, Blogger Alexandra said...

I love the way you have talked openly about your life, your views, your thoughts on religion, your love of children in need of adoption, and indeed adopted. It is rare in the Bloggosphere, and I for one appreciate it.
I smiled reading the story about your life, writen with much feeling, and little praise of your evident achievements.
You know, I was right about you, reading between the lines in the comment you made on my blog, and as I said in my reply to you today on the same post (this was prior to actually reading about you) you are a wonderfully straight forward, sensitive human being, with a great sense of fair play, and an incredible willingness to actually understand people and women (as a gender) in particular. I chuckle now, in light of the Althouse exchange, because I knew immediately I was right in my assumption.
I sometimes feel that blogging falls short in that respect, because we often talk at each other, and make assumptions based on each other's comments, and if we were able to take a little time to simply get to know each other even as superficially as I feel I know you now, having read the 'about you', I believe we would have far more productive exchanges, with less aggression, and underlying assumtion.
Was that more than three paragraphs? (LOL)

At 11:48 AM, Blogger Ken Pierce said...


On THIS blog, nobody is EVER criticized for the length of their comments. ;-)

Thanks very much for your kind comments; I'm glad you found it all enlightening. I hadn't reread the thing in a while and hadn't realized that it's really due for an update, since we successfully managed to adopt both Jessica and Jennifer (though we haven't been awarded their visa yet and thus haven't yet been able to bring them home). So I've added an update to the bottom of the post.

I'm enjoying the conversation on your blog, by the way.

At 10:56 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Inspiring story, but I'm afraid you'll have to rename your SUV.

Jack Daniels is NOT a Bourbon.

Go ahead, read the label...I'll wait...

At 7:40 PM, Blogger Ken Pierce said...

[grinning] Uh-oh, I'm outed...truth be told, I'm a Scotch man, myself. Oban will do though I much prefer Springbank. If I'm drinking American whiskey it's more likely to be Maker's Mark...

Next time I'm in the liquor store I'll have to find a bottle of Jack. What is it, really -- Tennessee sour mash whiskey or something?

At any rate, it's far too late now to go back and rename the Suburban Jim, now that ol' Jack is 150,000 miles into his life span or so.

At 10:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Maker's Mark is one of the best Bourbons around. Especially for the price.

Some other favorites: Knob Creek, Woodford, Bookers (especially the vat-proof version!), Blanton's, A.H.Hirsch (way overpriced!). I only drink Jim Beam under protest.

150,000mi does make your SUV kinda elderly. How about calling it "Old Fitzgerald" ? (another of my favorites)

At 10:39 AM, Blogger Ken Pierce said...

Back in the days when I was in sales and on a corporate expense account, I drank mostly Woodford, but when it's coming out of my own pocket...

At 4:55 PM, Blogger jess1dering said...

Ken, What a lovely , reassuring entry. I also read your adoption pieces and found them to be joy inspiring. I will be praying for you and for each precious member of your family. My prayers for you will be prayers of petition and of praise and gratitude. Please do keep us posted... it's an honor and a pleasure getting to know you all.

At 1:26 AM, Blogger LexKarla said...

Well...getting brave enough to post, I guess! re: the statement that "life is not fair"...this is what I would tell my kids :-) "Do you want life to be fair?" (little heads knodding up and down 'yes') "well, ok: then you have to live a sinless life, suffer and die on a cross, shed your blood for all of human-kind, be buried for 3 days, then rise from the dead...all for LOVE. Because the most UNFAIR thing in all of human history is Jesus Christ dying for you and your sins, so that we might have Eternal Life forever in Glory with God the Father." So, I am forever grateful that life is NOT FAIR!! My kids usually didn't want life to be "fair" after that...With blessings to you and Dessie and the kids! Karla

At 6:47 PM, Blogger kenneyjoe said...

Very interesting perspective. I found your blog because we share the same name...almost. I spell mine K-e-n-n-e-y Pierce. Born in West Texas w/ realives everywhere. Kin from Katy..we COULD be related, I reckon. The love of REAL bourbon is the key. I like the Libertarian thing and often wonder whether the party will grow now that things are so hateful and screwed up in the 2 party system, but am not optimistic. Wondering how an Episcopalian that went to Princeton is liking it in Katy TX. Truly respect the adoption thing and wish you well and God's blessings and protection on your move to Kaz. Check out my blog if you want...liberal-columnist.com. Don't be misled...I've been informed that I am a centrist since I started blogging. Blood's thicker n' water, right? Lemme know if there is a Joe C. Pierce anywhere in your family tree. Best of luck! Kenney Joe Pierce, Jr.

At 1:22 AM, Blogger Ben Wetherill said...


I am fairly new to blogging only becoming interested in it in the last year or two but I am finding that the blogosphere continues to show me just how small the world really is. I found your blog in a round about way, from Austin Bay to Alexandra's to yours, discovering someone who in many ways shares what I thought was a quirky way of looking at the world. You were born not too far from where my mother was born (Overton, TX) and the similarities go from there. I laughed at your view of government workers even though I am one (Border Patrol Agent and Coast Guard Reserve Officer). Although my job does employ the threatened use of force I don't believe in using any more force than is required. My childhood experience of bullies left me with a fierce dislike of those who abuse others either for personal amusement of criminal gain. I am also an Episcopalian on the way to being a deacon although I don't agree with the Therapy Branch as you label them. Although I am a registered Republican I find my political views somewhere between Libertarianism and Conservative Republicanism. I relish the sci-fi works of L.Neil Smith, a prominent Libertarian but find that my calling as a protector and my faith as a Christian cannot allow me to just standby minding my own business when others are being hurt. For those reasons I have agreed with the current war in Iraq although I am not entirely sure I agree with how the war has been administered. I am glad you don't mind long-windedness as this is a long way of saying I found alot of things I agree with in your blog and I look forward to reading more. Thanks.

At 10:39 PM, Blogger oakleyses said...

tiffany and co, polo outlet, nike air max, replica watches, longchamp outlet, louis vuitton, tory burch outlet, nike air max, longchamp outlet, louis vuitton outlet, nike outlet, prada handbags, ray ban sunglasses, christian louboutin, michael kors outlet store, kate spade outlet, louis vuitton, michael kors outlet online, louis vuitton outlet, oakley sunglasses, christian louboutin outlet, burberry outlet, christian louboutin shoes, uggs outlet, jordan shoes, chanel handbags, replica watches, ray ban sunglasses, louis vuitton outlet, ugg boots, nike free, ray ban sunglasses, cheap oakley sunglasses, christian louboutin uk, oakley sunglasses wholesale, gucci handbags, michael kors outlet, tiffany jewelry, longchamp outlet, michael kors outlet online, michael kors outlet, burberry handbags, michael kors outlet online, uggs on sale, ugg boots, prada outlet, polo ralph lauren outlet online, uggs outlet

At 10:45 PM, Blogger oakleyses said...

true religion jeans, nike air max, true religion outlet, burberry pas cher, vans pas cher, oakley pas cher, coach outlet, nike air force, polo ralph lauren, new balance, michael kors pas cher, timberland pas cher, sac hermes, longchamp pas cher, north face uk, nike air max uk, michael kors, michael kors, nike roshe run uk, ralph lauren uk, hollister uk, hollister pas cher, sac longchamp pas cher, air max, nike air max uk, nike tn, converse pas cher, true religion outlet, guess pas cher, ray ban pas cher, jordan pas cher, nike roshe, nike free uk, louboutin pas cher, nike free run, north face, ray ban uk, polo lacoste, mulberry uk, sac vanessa bruno, lululemon canada, hogan outlet, true religion outlet, coach outlet store online, abercrombie and fitch uk, nike blazer pas cher, michael kors outlet, coach purses

At 10:50 PM, Blogger oakleyses said...

valentino shoes, nike air max, hollister clothing, ghd hair, vans, soccer shoes, timberland boots, longchamp uk, ferragamo shoes, converse outlet, ralph lauren, nike air max, herve leger, mcm handbags, celine handbags, converse, nike roshe run, bottega veneta, jimmy choo outlet, baseball bats, chi flat iron, louboutin, vans outlet, hollister, hollister, north face outlet, new balance shoes, oakley, asics running shoes, mac cosmetics, wedding dresses, babyliss, mont blanc pens, abercrombie and fitch, ray ban, giuseppe zanotti outlet, north face outlet, lululemon, gucci, iphone 6 cases, instyler, beats by dre, reebok outlet, nfl jerseys, hermes belt, p90x workout, insanity workout, soccer jerseys

At 10:59 PM, Blogger oakleyses said...

swarovski crystal, michael kors outlet, michael kors handbags, moncler, replica watches, juicy couture outlet, coach outlet, moncler, moncler uk, thomas sabo, doke gabbana, louis vuitton, ugg uk, montre pas cher, links of london, louis vuitton, moncler, supra shoes, canada goose outlet, michael kors outlet online, canada goose, pandora jewelry, wedding dresses, doudoune moncler, canada goose, karen millen uk, barbour, louis vuitton, lancel, swarovski, moncler outlet, barbour uk, ugg pas cher, pandora uk, marc jacobs, canada goose jackets, canada goose outlet, pandora charms, canada goose uk, moncler outlet, canada goose, ugg,ugg australia,ugg italia, ugg,uggs,uggs canada, pandora jewelry, juicy couture outlet, louis vuitton, hollister, moncler, ugg, toms shoes, louis vuitton, canada goose outlet

At 9:34 AM, Blogger Quang Đào Duy said...

Chung cư Green Pearl nằm trong quần thể Dự án Green Pearl tại số 378 Minh Khai, Vĩnh Tuy, Hai Bà Trưng, Hà Nội là một vị trí đắc địa thuộc cửa ngõ phía Nam của Thủ đô, tiếp giáp với đường Minh và KĐT times city. Căn hộ chung cư cao cấp Green Pearl sẽ mở ra không gian sống xanh, trong lành, KHÔNG ồn ào, KHÔNG khói bụi ngay trong lòng đô thị.


Post a Comment

<< Home